On Jun 21 03:01, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 09:40 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Sure? I tried that first, but it didn't work. The end result still > > linked against the cygstdc++ and cyggcc_s DLLs. Specifying all three > > flags was the only way I could convince g++ to link these libs > > statically. > > Hmm, it WFM with gcc-4.5; perhaps 4.3 is somehow different in that > regard. > > (Ahem, Dave? Can we get a stable 4.5.3 already?)
That would be cool. And if so, gcc should be configured to set the large address awareness flag in executable PE headers by default. Btw., did anybody experiment with setting the ASLR flag for DLLs? Chuck's description sounds as if this really might help to reduce collision problems at fork time. If so, the ASLR flag should become default for DLLs. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
