On Jul 25 12:49, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 25 July 2011 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > [This time *with* patch...] > > > > Hi guys, > > > > we discussed this back in May already, but somehow we didn't get a > > final result. The thread was kind of confusing, so I re-open a new > > one now. > > > > We talked about using mintty as our default shell. I created a setup > > patch which I attached to this mail again. Instead of "Cygwin Bash > > Shell" in the start menu and "Cygwin" on the desktop, it creates > > "Cygwin Terminal" shortcuts in both of them. > > > > Is that ok? > > If I remember correctly, we were going to go with just "Cygwin" on the > desktop. I'll have a proper look later. > > > Apart from that, why is mintty still not in the "Base" category? > > Just laziness on our side? > > I kept on putting it off because there was always that one more bug to > fix. No excuses now that I've bumped it to 1.0. > > > Some really important reason? > > My one remaining concern is the postinstall script, which would create > the "Cygwin/mintty" start menu entry for every Cygwin user, whether > they want it or not. Deleting it wouldn't help either, as it would > come back at the next mintty update.
Not a big problem, IMHO. Just as soon as we change setup, the postinstall script should go away, I guess. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
