On 8/31/2011 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 30 13:51, Warren Young wrote:
On 8/30/2011 2:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
So I'd still love to see a still with a beveled, less glossy C, if
that's ok with you...
did you have a chance to look into that?
Still plinking away at it, an hour or so a night, off and on.
It requires completely rebuilding the 3D model.
Don't worry, I'll get you something eventually.
But that sounds like a lot of work. I really thought that would be
simpler.
It's not really difficult. Most of the delay comes from playing,
procrastination, and perfectionism.
If you're trying to get something released, give me a deadline. That
will concentrate my efforts.
Here's the reply from legal: We can use your 2D results from the DAZ
art, as long as you put your resulting work under a free license which
plays nice along the GPL. You don't have to assign copyright to some
other entity like, say, Red Hat.
GPL or FAL(*) both sound good to me; FAL matches the intent better, I
guess.
Lacking any recommendation, I would have gone with some CC variant.
I'll look into FAL first now.
If it turns out that I still like CC better, I'll check for GPL
compatibility. I can already rule out all the "Attribution" variants,
for the same reason 4-clause BSD is incompatible, right?
