On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late >> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a >> new release? > > Yes. Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1? I recommend the former, > since there has been many significant changes.
I agree: 4.0. We could call it "rebase NT" for "New Technology" -- that is much better than 3.1, which is merely a pretty wrapper around the same old underlying cruft. :-) Did anybody see the suggested new logo for the linux 3.1 kernel: http://thehackernews.com/2011/09/suggested-linux-31-kernel-logo.html -- Chuck
