On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 19:01 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently > > offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with > > realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build > > with cygutils dropping the weaker variant? Or do we want to keep the > > cygutils variant for a while longer? > > I prefer standard tools when possible, and smaller cygutils. So, let's > go ahead and coordinate removing realpath from cygutils-$next.
While you're at it, what about ascii(1)? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2011-10/msg00113.html Yaakov
