On Mar 23 10:59, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > On 23.03.2012 10:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Volker? > > > >On Mar 19 10:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>Volker? Ping? > >> > >>On Mar 13 09:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>On Mar 12 14:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >>>>On 2012-03-12 10:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>>>Btw., no package in the distro still requires any older version of > >>>>>libopenldap that libopenldap2_3_0. Can we move the libopenldap2 and > >>>>>libopenldap2_2_7 packages into the _obsolete category? > >>>> > >>>>If nothing in the distro requires these anymore then IMO they should > >>>>just be removed entirely. > >>> > >>>Fine with me. Volker? > > > >It's nice that you update your packages, but I don't quite understand > >why you don't reply to my question. Have I done something wrong? > > Sorry, I was about to answer this friday because I was busy teaching. > > When we just remove the packages from the distro, then everybody who > downloaded them already will still have them in their local cygwin > tree. > > Wouldn't it be better if I provide empty packages for them ? > Basically that't what I wanted to do this friday together with an > update to the latest openldap package.
That's really up to you. I'm happy one way or the other. I would just like to get rid of the last packages with a dependency to minires. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
