On May 29 09:37, Eric Blake wrote: > Upstream coreutils is considering completely dropping su, in favor of > having util-linux provide su across all GNU/Linux distros. Right now, > cygwin's su.exe comes from coreutils, but with a cygwin-specific patch, > and it still doesn't do quite what users are used to from a Linux > perspective. Is it better to completely drop su from cygwin, or should > I coordinate with the util-linux maintainer to hand control of su out of > coreutils and over to util-linux?
I don't see any pressing reason to keep su, but ultimately it's between you both. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
