2012-10-26 00:20 David Sastre Medina On 2012-10-25 23:20, David Sastre Medina wrote: | > https://github.com/dsastrem/base-files.git | | Most probably, a wrong assumption on my side.
No worries, it caught my attention as it was an unusual choice, considering the existing licencing policy in Open Source software projects. | License in the base-files package contents. | What would be more appropriate? GPLv3? The relevant[1] big ones are GPL, BSD-2-clause, MIT and Apache. Trying to avoid license fragmentation is always a good move. I'll provide you a patch against Github to switch to GPL-3+. Thank you for your work on improving the base-files project, Jari [1] For interested, the official license abbreviations are maintained at the Linux Foundation SPDX Open Source License Registry http://spdx.org/licenses/