On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 00:46 +0000, David Stacey wrote: > 1. keepassx is present in Cygwin Ports. Yaakov: Are you happy for > keepassx to be moved into the main Cygwin distro? If so, are you happy > for me to maintain it, or would you prefer to do so yourself?
You may take it. I have modernized the build in git: http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/keepassx I suggest you bump RELEASE to 2 and build it yourself, then proceed with ITP. > I'm not aware that an alpha version of 2.0 exists in any Linux > distribution (most distros provide 0.4.3), so you may consider that > 2.0-alpha3 is not appropriate for Cygwin. However, even if we choose not > to take the 'alpha' release at this stage, we will have to solve > question (3) eventually (when the new 2.0 release becomes current). I don't generally bother with prereleases where a stable version exists. If the major distros are using 0.4.3 (Fedora is among them, I just checked), then I would just ship that and deal with 2.0 when it goes stable. Yaakov
