On Feb 13 14:00, marco atzeri wrote: > On 2/13/2013 1:43 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >Hi Corinna, > > > >On 12 February 2013 10:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>since openssl 1.0.1 is our recent version for a while now, I'd like to > >>ask those of you which still have packages linked against libopenssl098 > >>to update your packages to new versions linked against libopenssl100. > >> > >>The following packages are affected: > >> > >> libtorrent11 Chris Sutcliffe > >> libtorrent14 Chris Sutcliffe > >> > >>There isn't much pressure yet, since I'll continue to support the old > >>libopenssl098 a while, but if it's not asked too much, it would be nice > >>if you could update your packages. > > > >I've been fighting with the latest stable rtorrent / libtorrent (as > >have many people - FreeBSD, etc.) as it has a tendency to peg CPUs at > >100%. As a result the Cygwin release is lagging behind the upstream > >release and is the reason there hasn't been a recent release. I'm > >more than happy to rebuild the current release (i.e. libtorrent14) > >against the updated libopenssl, question I have is do I also need to > >rebuild the previous release (i.e. libtorrent11), or can we just drop > >it? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Chris > > > > as libtorrent11 is required by no current package , drop it.
ACK. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
