On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:59:28PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >>On 2013-10-07 14:46, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:00PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >>>> The attached patch for genini allows it to recognize (and ignore) the >>>> new setup.hint tags. >>> >>> Only skip: is a valid setup.hint tag. >> >>OK, bad wording, but genini accepts an existing setup.ini as input, so >>it needs to understands its tags as well. > >Ok. I guess genini is more forgiving about accepting setup.ini keywords. > >FWIW, I will probably be removing parsing of setup.ini from upset at some >point. upset no longer reads setup.ini when generating a new setup.ini.
Actually, this is nonsense. I forgot that I still have to parse setup.ini for some stuff. cgf
