Hello, Yaakov. Thursday, August 21, 2014, 6:04:38 you wrote:
> I'm wondering if onc-rpc-devel (which I'm starting to think should just > be called rpcgen) shouldn't obsolete sunrpc too instead of this. I went for a new name because rpcgen was just rpcgen, and the new package is rpcgen + includes. Actually initially i didn't want to touch rpcgen at all, and just make onc-rpc-headers, however after that i thought that both packages are quite small, so it makes sense to merge them. After all, .x files are useless without rpcgen and vice versa. And both are used for development only. > It's a bit of a tough call because there is some overlap here. Original sunrpc package consists of these includes and portmap. onc-rpc-devel now has includes, and rpcbind is a new portmap. So, as a result, none of two new packages alone completely obsoletes sunrpc, but both of them do. How to specify this ? As to the rest of notes, i'll fix that. -- Kind regards, Pavel