> > > I'd like to have some more input here. Maintainers, if you have any > > > input to this, please follow up. > > > > I'm sorry - I didn't follow the previous discussion and am having trouble > > following this. Could you please restate what's being proposed? > > It starts here: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-11/msg00064.html > > Two major proposals on the plate: > > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-11/msg00086.html > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-11/msg00098.html
Thanks. Frankly it all looks overcomplicated to me. The current system of "here's a postinstall script, run it once some time after the package files are installed" has always completely met my needs. But I get that other packages have stronger requirements, so I don't object. As long as cygport will handle the details of naming the script, maybe from hints in the cygport file about the priority or order, then it doesn't matter to me which proposal we use. Andrew
