On 7/26/16, 11:13 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>Erm, I'm belatedly comprehending it's two independent FUSE >implementations and not two versions with some common history. OK. If >there's a documented binary API at some level of the FUSE definition >that both implementations provide then that's what the proposed "fuse" >package could export. Both implementations would then independently >supply code that meets the API. I'm not sure how much extra work this >means for both projects. Mark, please see my other response, where I (think that I) proposed something similar. Bill
