On 9/8/16, 1:03 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:

>I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now.  When we
>have a
>consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it.
>I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral
>FUSE implementations.  It can be seen at
>https://github.com/mgeisert/cygfuse .
>I've also read up a little on Dokan and Dokany, so I should be able to
>respond to any comments Adrien might have about the updated cygfuse.

Mark, has there been any additional progress on this?

Looking at the updated cygfuse I believe one change would be to rename
cygfuse.pc back to fuse.pc so that build configuration scripts can find
it. I have created a github issue for this.

Other than that I would think that the package would be ready for
submission. Any changes to support additional projects like Dokany, etc.
could easily happen in the future when those projects are ready.


Reply via email to