On 2019-10-04 08:51, ASSI wrote:
> I am looking at that package, but sadly it is in an advanced state of
> bitrot.  The source package doesn't contain all the files that are
> actually needed for the binary package.  Besides, exim itself uses one
> of these homegrown build systems that has of course changed since the
> last time exim was built for Cygwin.  I've got it to compile, but the
> packaging is incomplete and requires quite a bit more work than I was
> planning to spend.

That was what I found and thought.
If you don't mind me asking, how much did you get to build, and what do you see
needing done?
If you got further than me, I might be willing to complete the packaging.

> I would suggest to drop the package unless Pierre provides an update
> himself, but if anybody wants to adopt the package and fix things up
> properly I'll be happy to let you have the incomplete cygport file and
> patches.

+1

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

Reply via email to