Christopher Faylor wrote: > However, I'm willing to be swayed on the issue. If everyone else agrees > that changing the default is the right decision, I'll be happy to do it. I'm in favor of removing -DWIN32 / -DWINNT from the specs file for normal gcc compiles (they *would* be defined for -mno-cygwin compiles). However, the real issue is Red Hat's paying cygwin customers -- how would *they* react to this change? --Chuck
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Charles Wilson
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Carlos Puig
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Charles Wilson
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Charles Wilson
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
