> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] <snip> > This whole deal smacks of pure stubborn-ness. "I don't like the > official installation method (even though it was the subject of months > of debate) so I'm gonna muddy the waters with an rpm distro" "Even > though I'm maintaining an rpm of bind for cygwin, I will not > contribute > a binary .tar.gz so that users of the official installation method can > benefit..." I just hope it doesn't degrade into the GNU-emacs vs. XEmacs frackas, where there are actually two very good and very similar packages with one freely using code from the other, but donating none back to the original. (This is not a commentary on XEmacs, I actually use both.)
- for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Robert Collins
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Charles Wilson
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Robert Collins
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Travis Howell
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Travis Howell
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Robert Collins
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Christopher Faylor
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Parker, Ron
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Enoch Wu
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Christopher Faylor
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Charles Wilson
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Anon Sricharoenchai
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge DJ Delorie
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Anon Sricharoenchai
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Christopher Faylor
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge DJ Delorie
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Anon Sricharoenchai
- Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge Christopher Faylor
