On Wednesday 4 Apr 01, Paul Garceau writes: > Hmmm... > > On 4 Apr 2001, at 14:46, the Illustrious Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > So why tsk me? Chris asked the question. Obviously the answer is yes, > > we need a cygwin-apps FAQ-O-MATIC. > > > > Earnie. > > Perhaps he doesn't know what a faq-o-matic is...? > > At any rate, an example can be found at the gcc main website > (www.gnu.org/gcc?). In the thread associated with the message that Robert cited, I point out that the GCC F-O-M is a very poor example of how F-O-M should be used! That said, I think a Cygwin F-O-M would be a great idea, if done properly, and I would be willing to convert the existing "user" FAQ into F-O-M, but I think it would be a lot of work and I don't know where the time would come from. Cheers, David
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cygwin r... Earnie Boyd
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Robert Collins
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Earnie Boyd
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Robert Collins
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest:... Christopher Faylor
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Paul Garceau
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest:... David Starks-Browning
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Robert Collins
- Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest:... Paul Garceau
- RE: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Robert Collins
- RE: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest:... Paul Garceau
- RE: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cyg... Robert Collins
