On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:48:34AM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > anything without an underscore? I wonder if gcc is just wrong in defining > WIN32 and WINNT. On the pragmatic side, whatever is working carries more weight than mere consistency. Consistency is a goal but design that meets the spec. is the final goal. > > So even MS is inconsistent. (Actually, that's not much of a surprise, is > it?) > > --Chuck Same comment as above. EW
- gcc/ansi question Christopher Faylor
- Re: gcc/ansi question Earnie Boyd
- Re: gcc/ansi question Charles S. Wilson
- Re: gcc/ansi question Christopher Faylor
- Re: gcc/ansi question Charles S. Wilson
- Re: gcc/ansi question Enoch Wu
- Re: gcc/ansi question Benjamin Riefenstahl
- Re: gcc/ansi question Christopher Faylor
