On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:13:49PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> So finally, IMO, it's up to Chuck - Chuck if you feel you wouldn't be
> copying, rather creating anew something you have seen working elsewhere,
> then stand up and be counted. 

Of course we shouldn't reproduce cygipc.  What we need is a general
purpose server process which has ipc just as one part.  I just don't
see a reason that Chuck couldn't work on the ipc part of that server. 
Assuming he _wants_ to, of course.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.

Reply via email to