"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > I wonder why it is neccessary to 'rename' a package. > There will be two packages in future? Runtime and Devel? > For consistency. The package is distributed by MinGW.org as mingw-runtime-$(VERSION). The new package will supersede the old one. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Christopher Faylor
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Earnie Boyd
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Earnie Boyd
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Earnie Boyd
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Charles Wilson
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Christopher Faylor
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Earnie Boyd
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Christopher Faylor
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Gerrit P. Haase
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Earnie Boyd
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Christopher Faylor
- Re: Mingw and w32api package names. Charles Wilson
