--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 02:32:15PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: > >>I'd like to have fastcall conventions. I think it is necessary if we > >>want gcc to be a replacement for MSVC. > >> > >I'll need to think about that. Do I really want that? > > I'd say that you would for your own peace of mind. > > It cuts down on the "This compile well using Microsoft! Why it not gcc!" > types of complaints. >
Lately, I've been hearing this with STL code: "This compile well using gcc! Why it not MS!" Thats what I want -- the first part of that anyway. Danny http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase - Manage your files online.
