On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:15:50PM +1300, Craig McGeachie wrote: >On 18 Nov 2002 at 17:57, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Why? > >I am looking for house and job, and staying with a friend, who runs a >small LAN, shares the dialup connection, and is sufficiently paranoid >to run a firewall setup with mail and HTTP relaying (amongst others) - >no exceptions.
I'm not sure how you are going to be able to maintain this if you can't build from CVS. If a fix is needed, you'll need to be able to make it to the CVS sources. I appreciate the work you've put into this but I do see a problem here. >> but I will note that putting a "Cygwin internal" comment in front of >> static functions isn't adding any useful information. > >I need more comments anyway. Just testing the water before I go all >out adding them. I put "Cygwin internal" in because that is what I saw >in net.cc, and I thought it might be some sort of standard. I never noticed those comments before. They're gone now. >> Otherwise, from a cursory glance, it looks fine. You will definitely >> need to send in an assignment. > >Will do. It'll take maybe a week to arrive from New Zealand. In the >meantime I have to tidy up the submission a bit. > >I've tried to compile the source for Cygwin 1.3.15-2 prior to putting >netdb.cc in, but I am having problems with fhandler_serial.cc. With >the rewrite of fhandler_serial::ioctl, and the inclusion of >ddk/ntddser.h, I can no longer compile. I have copy of the W2K DDK, >and tried pointing the compiler at the include directory there, but >unsurprisingly this doesn't work. Is there a Cygwin version of the DDK >headers that I should use, in the same way that w32api provides a >Cygwin version of the Win32 SDK headers? The sources in the release need the *CVS* version of w32api. See? Problems already. cgf
