On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:56:35AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:49:59AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>OK, following Chris' remarks here is a much smaller set
>>of changes.
>
>Do you think it would make sense to do something along the lines
>of:
>
>>+ path_conv pc (cfd->is_device ? cfd->get_name () : cfd->get_win32_name (),
>>PC_SYM_NOFOLLOW);
cfd->is_device ()
Btw, thanks much for understanding about this. I appreciate
that you were trying to fix this the right way the first time.
cgf
