On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:41:17AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Somehow I'm missing a description why that's necessary and the > > implications. > > > I am getting paranoid. Most often we duplicate DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS > without thinking about what access is really needed. It would be a good > discipline to ask ourselves what is needed and give just that. Here nothing > is needed at all. > Also, if you use sysinternals you can see the access mask. Setting it > properly creates differentiating features that help distinguish between > all the handles.
This handle is only used to have a handle. It's never accessed, just kept so that we not get the same Winpid again, right? If so, the patch is ok, of course. I was just missing a description. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.