On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:43:50PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Actually, on poking around a little, I wonder if we should be calling >>_reclaim_reent to get back all of the stuff allocated in the REENT >>structure? > >I think you are right. Here is my patch to thread.cc that i will apply >if there are no objections.
Looks ok to me. cgf >diff -urp src.org/thread.cc src/thread.cc >--- src.org/thread.cc 2003-11-11 09:16:39.775574400 +0100 >+++ src/thread.cc 2003-11-11 09:21:24.304707200 +0100 >@@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ pthread::exit (void *value_ptr) > mutex.unlock (); > } > >+ (_reclaim_reent) (_REENT); >+ > if (InterlockedDecrement (&MT_INTERFACE->threadcount) == 0) > ::exit (0); > else >@@ -1879,6 +1881,7 @@ __reent_t::init_clib (struct _reent& var > var._stdout = _GLOBAL_REENT->_stdout; > var._stderr = _GLOBAL_REENT->_stderr; > var.__sdidinit = _GLOBAL_REENT->__sdidinit; >+ var.__cleanup = _GLOBAL_REENT->__cleanup; > _clib = &var; > };
