On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 12:29:26AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >For example, that would also prevent a process from being killed while >exec'ing, while the baby is still suspended. Of course an exec stub >should still handle the signal, somehow, although you expressed other >ideas earlier in this thread.
This part, at least, I can comment on. You really can't turn off signals while exec'ing because you don't know if you need to be hanging around as a stub waiting for a non-cygwin process to terminate. cgf
