Danny Smith wrote: > From: "Corinna Vinschen" > > Let's ask the MingW folks. Danny, Earnie, any problem with a header > > file being LGPL'ed? > > I dislike the introduction of LGPL into the w32api.
Ok, fair enough. I'll bring it up on the Wine list and see if it might be possible to dual license the files. Before I do that, it would be good to know what I should be begging for. If public domain isn't acceptable for the copyright holders, which of the more popular open source licenses are acceptable for files in w32api? Another way forward would be to try out the ReWind version of the files. Those are under the MIT/X11 license, but they are not as complete as the Wine versions. So, specifically, is a MIT/X11 license acceptable? Cheers, Peter
