At 12:13 AM 3/4/2005 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:45:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >>- the mu_to was not reinitialized on forks (non-inheritable event). > >I just spent at least ten minutes looking for a "mu_to" in cygwin, >trying to figure out what you were referring to. I'm not sure why >you're putting an underscore in the middle there. Maybe you're thinking >that the "mu" and "to" have separate meanings but they really don't.
Good question. Perhaps because it was late and there is an _ before the muto in new_muto. >Did you actually see mutos not getting created? Looking at the code >now, it seems like there would be a new muto created every time >there is a new instance of timer_tracker, which was certainly wrong but >it is different from mutos not being created after a fork. As far as I could see, the muto was only created by the constructor of ttstart and not recreated after a fork. But perhaps you are right and it was created every time. At any rate it should be OK now. Pierre
