> > Btw, the use of a ?: c is a conscious decision. > > Maybe I'm just old fashion and do not like "a ? : c", but I > don't understand why you use it, other than saving a few > keystrokes. Look, aside from the fact it keeps -pedantic > from producing an error, explicitly expanding to "a ? a : c" > makes the code easier to read and the intent more clear.
Yikes. I didn't even know you could do "a ? : c". When did C++ become Perl? -- Gary R. Van Sickle
