"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > I don't believe that your patch goes far enough to ensure the > consistency of the shared memory before checking things. I've checked > in a change which should ensure that the area has been initialized > before it is used.
That's great, thanks. Will there be a snapshot that includes the next patch? The cygwin.com/snapshots page says both that snapshots are generated "on a period basis" and "sporadically" - wasn't sure if that meant I should request one or just be patient. :) Thanks again for the prompt attention. -Usman
