On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:30:25PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>The attached patch solves this problem by rearranging the code a bit. It
>tries to be non-intrusive. I offer it for discussion and comments. I hope
>that my description of the problem and the patch will help to resolve the
>issue even if the patch will get rejected in favour of a better one.

It seems like your description and your rearrangement are probably
correct.  This is a classic race.

Want to provide a changelog?

cgf

Reply via email to