On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 13:52 -0800, Max Kaehn wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:17 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > But, that is the whole point of setting my_sendsig to > > INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE. > > Which I would've picked up if I had read the change log (RTFCL). :-P > > > > * sigproc.cc (no_signals_available): test for my_sendsig == > > > INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE. > > > This seems like it should work. Does it have the same effect? > > It looks good; I'll put it on the test machine and fire it up. I > can usually get the problem to reproduce by leaving a cycle of > repeated builds running overnight, and I'll post the result > to this thread tomorrow.
20 builds haven't reproduced the problem. Thanks!
