On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:53:35PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >I think this removes some redundancy and a questionable check while being >more straight forward and covering more possible fault cases. Please let >me know if I missed a reason it had to be that way. > >2006-07-26 Brian Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * miscfuncs.cc (dummytest): Delete.
Thanks for the patch, but I'm not convinced that this patch duplicates the functionality that you eliminated from check_iovec. It is not "more straighforward" to move a check out of a function and duplicate it in callers of the function. And, the dummytest is actually there for a reason. Unless you can give more of a rationale for your changes they will not be applied. cgf
