On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:29:59PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sep 28 09:06, Igor Peshansky wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> [...] >> > The latest fax was about this change, so I think this should still be >> > covered, shouldn't it? Ping the guy nevertheless. We should stay on >> > the safe side in legal questions. >> >[...] >> Looks like I've been remiss in following up on this, though I regenerated >> the patch that same day. Attached is the new version of the patch. I >> believe "the fax" (the new one) has been sent, but I've received no >> notification of that, presumably because Corinna is not around... >> Igor > >I didn't receive any notification either, so this somehow got stuck on >one side. I'm going to check my side, would you mind to ping yours? > >As soon as that's clarified, I'll apply your patch.
Didn't we resolve a while ago not to worry about assignments for cygcheck? I don't see any reason to care since it is not really a core cygwin component - it's more of a debugging tool, and I don't see it as a big deal for any corporate customers. cgf
