Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
> what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should
> check it in there too.

Okay, I'll let her take care of the branch since she's been handling all
the releases from it.

> The problem in this case would be "Hey!  Look at what cygcheck is saying!
> You are using Windows 9x!  You can't do that!"

In a sense it already does this:

    case VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_WINDOWS:
      switch (osversion.dwMinorVersion)
        {
        case 0:
          osname = "95 (not supported)";
          break;
        case 10:
          osname = "98 (not supported)";
          break;
        case 90:
          osname = "ME (not supported)";
          break;
        default:
          osname = "9X (not supported)";
          break;
        }
      break;

Brian

Reply via email to