Christopher Faylor wrote: > Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of > what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should > check it in there too.
Okay, I'll let her take care of the branch since she's been handling all the releases from it. > The problem in this case would be "Hey! Look at what cygcheck is saying! > You are using Windows 9x! You can't do that!" In a sense it already does this: case VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_WINDOWS: switch (osversion.dwMinorVersion) { case 0: osname = "95 (not supported)"; break; case 10: osname = "98 (not supported)"; break; case 90: osname = "ME (not supported)"; break; default: osname = "9X (not supported)"; break; } break; Brian