Christopher Faylor wrote: > That was going to be my first observation, actually. I'm still trying > to digest the patch but it seems like it wouldn't work well with the > fork retry code.
The patch doesn't change any behavior though: in current Cygwin if the thing we're exec()ing returns a Win32 exit code of C0000135 (or whatever) then we retry creating it 5 times. With the patch, we still retry starting it 5 times but after the last one fails we recognise the situation and print a message. Brian
