[Cc list trimmed] Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:52:14AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote: >> I've tested >> this by doing (separate) native builds of GCC, winsup, ^^^^^^ :P see below!
>> GCC is in stage 4, but this is target-specific and fixes a bootstrap >> failure on a secondary platform. >> >> Ok for HEAD of both gcc/ and src/ ? >> >> libiberty/ChangeLog >> >> * configure.ac (funcs, vars, checkfuncs): Don't munge on Cygwin, as it >> no longer shares libiberty object files. * configure: Regenerated. > > Just in case you need confirmation: this looks fine. Thanks, I thought it would be the right thing to do. Just waiting on DJ or ILT's approval now. > I removed the dependence on libiberty a while ago partially because, > AFAICT, it actually subverted Red Hat's claim of owning all source code > in Cygwin. You can't really say that if there are pure FSF GPLed or > LGPLed pieces. Yep, I discovered that you removed it from the winsup module definition, I only "tested" it for a winsup build (as mentioned above) because I had an old source tree that still had it there by accident of "cvs -dP" not removing subdirectories that only get changed in the modules list. In a fresh checkout there's nothing to test! cheers, DaveK