On Apr 11 04:51, Dave Korn wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Good point, I guess. So, if we all agree on that, I'd suggest to > > change Dave's patch to the one below. > > Two hunks went astray in the adjustment, the fixes for INTPTR_Mxx and > SIZE_MAX still apply because we didn't change their types. > > Also, Joseph just introduced a new testcase in GCC SVN, and it shows up a > problem with our definition of WINT_MAX.
What problem exactly? UINT_MAX not defined? > * include/stdint.h (INTPTR_MIN, INTPTR_MAX): Add 'L' suffix. > (WINT_MAX): Add 'U' suffix. Applied. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
