On 06/05/2010 19:24, Charles Wilson wrote: > But...if I understand correctly, doing this moves the "fix" for the > problem Dave identified into that internal code -- which means that the > mingw guys won't benefit from it, unless they re-implement it in the > "outside" code.
The mingw guys won't benefit from this fix until they implement fork
semantics, i.e. never...
cheers,
DaveK
