On 09/09/2010 1:03 PM, Dave Korn wrote: >> but I think we >> should keep the parsing of /etc/fstab as lean as possible; > > I don't understand why. How many times per second does /etc/fstab get > parsed?
I interpreted cgf's comment as not wishing to add to the amount of coupling with /etc/fstab. /etc/fstab is already parsed for /usr/bin and /usr/lib, so in my mind the additional query for /tmp doesn't seem to add significantly. Earl
