On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:42:49AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >On 10/09/2010 22:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Looks nice to me with one HUGE caveat: Please maintain the pseudo-sorted >> order in cygwin.din. Sorry to have to impose this burden on you. > > No, that's fine; I've never been sure whether we need to care about the >ordinal numbers or not in that file. (AFAIK, we don't have any realistic >scenarios where anyone would be linking against the Cygwin DLL by ordinal >imports, but I hate making assumptions based only on my own limited >experience...)
It never even occurred to me about ordinal numbers but since I've been reorganizing that file for years I guess it hasn't been a problem. cgf
