On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:21:14AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote: >On 11/05/2011 10:13 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On May 11 02:18, Ryan Johnson wrote: >>>> Please find attached five patches [...] >>> Oops, wrong mailing list... >>> >>> Btw., it would be nice if you could create patches with the diff -p flag >>> as well. It's not exactly essential, but IMHO it's quite a help when >>> trying to review patches. >>> >>> Another problem is this: While you provide separate patches, you don't >>> provide separate ChangeLogs. That makes it kind of hard to apply them >>> separately. Would you mind to create one ChangeLog per change? >> Ditto. This really needs to be broken down into easier to review chunks. >All right. Let's try this again with the correct mailing list. > >The patches have been generated with diff -p, and each includes >appropriate changelog entries. Hopefully the changes are split up finely >enough because I don't know a good way to break them down any further. > >For posterity's sake I'm including the original message body below.
Please: One patch per message. One ChangeLog entry per message, not sent as a diff. cgf