On May 12 15:19, Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 12/05/2011 2:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Nope. As I wrote in my previoous mail and as you can still see in my > >quote above, the two virtual memory areas from 0x20000 to 0x30000 and > >from 0x30000 to 0x230000 together constitute a single start block in > >heap 2. The OS is a great faker in terms of information returned to > >the application, apparently. > OK. I finally understand now. I was assuming the heap would not > report multiple allocations as a single heap region. > > Windows is weird.
Exaclty. Funnily, in the end it always boils down to that. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat