On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 01:03:41PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: >>> ... >>> OK, __INSIDE_CYGWIN__ is not needed here in practice (but possibly in >>> theory :-) >> I would rather see as little __INSIDE_CYGWIN__ as possible >> in external headers. > >OK, removed and Cygwin compilation tested. > >>> Would the patch with __INSIDE_CYGWIN__ removed be GTG? >> Yes. > >Thanks - patch committed.
Thanks a lot for the patch. cgf