On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:22:13PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:09PM +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote: >>On 03/11/2011 21:05, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> I would still prefer eschewing actively negative words like "hostile" and >>> just >>> neutrally stating that Windows does not use a fork/exec model and does not >>> offer >>> any easy way to implement fork. >> >>Hmm, yes, I'll fix that. > >Thanks. > >>> I'd also like to see specific errors mentioned so that when people are >>> searching for >>> a solution to the problem they will be able to find it in the FAQ. >> >>Is there something wrong with the itemized list which follows that sentence? > >No, sorry. I'm email challenged at the moment so I missed it.
Btw, since this is such a glaring omission from the FAQ I think you should make the edits that Corinna and I suggested and just check it in. We can tweak it as needed when people express confusion. Thanks to you and Ryan for doing this. We really needed it. cgf