On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:09:21AM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote: >On 1/2/12 9:59 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 12:59:00PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> I guess this can go in since I already "implemented" sigqueue but >> SI_QUEUE isn't actually fully functional. Cygwin doesn't queue signals >> and I don't believe it handles the sigval union correctly. > >By the way: have you had a chance to track down the signal-related >crash bug at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-04/msg00989.html ? I >can still reproduce it.
This is not a bug-reporting mailing list.
