On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:35:16PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >On 2012-04-23 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote: >>> I *get* that. My problem was, the web is so cluttered with pages mentioning >>> the no-cygwin thing (including the cygwin FAQ!) that finding a good howto is >>> nearly impossible. >>> >>> Is there a deep reason not to amend the FAQ? >> >> No, there is no reason not to change the FAQ. >> >> Could someone provide some appropriate words? > >Patch attached.
Thanks very much. Please check in (with typo correction mentioned in followon mail). I suspect that we'll probably need to flesh this out over time but at least we aren't suggesting the use of a deprecated compiler option now. cgf
