On 26/05/14 14:36, Peter Rosin wrote:
I believe the comment refers to if "static" is the right answer to the problem. Is there a need to handle concurrent calls?
I can't really comment on that. As the code stands, neither of the two functions that we are discussing are reentrant. As long as the author and the user(s) of the routines are both aware of that then it isn't a problem.
I was just trying to fix a coding error that was picked up by Coverity Scan; it wasn't my intention to question the design.
Cheers, Dave.
